224 valkyrie vs 308

True story, my Dad decided to improve our herd through breeding, and bought two, very high dollar boar's. It has succeeded because it offers excellent performance, low recoil, solid backing from a major ammunition manufacturer, and enables the use of long, high BC bullets in a semi-auto rifle magazine. Caliber: 224 Valkyrie - WC-15 Platform. It is a solid 1/2moa rifle and Ive had no issues out to 800 yards. Nosler does a lot of comparing 223 Rem with 22 Nosler, and it's true that the 22 Nosler kicks the butt of a lot of standard 223 Rem loads, with their quoted velocities of 2650 for a 75gr bullet out of 223 Rem and 2950 for a 75 out of an 18" 22 Nosler. But there are two things missing from that equation: 5.56 loads and Hornady Superformance. But either way i won't be using it next year. We can see this from their load recommendations. "You're comparing a premium match grade free floated thing with a 'fighting carbine'! Though still shy of the Creedmoor ballistically, from an AR-15 its as close as youre going to getat least until something new and even more specialized comes along. Bullet Weight: .224 Valkyrie. Genealogy of the 224 ValkyrieMost new centerfire cartridges are based on current cases. On 11/28/2020 at 3:27 PM, ARTrooper said: The hog from hell, 224 Valkyrie vs 400 pound hog. These are accurate numbers for some 223 Rem loads. the bullet went in his snout and came out the back of his neck. With every passing industry trade show, we are introduced to the next big thing, or little thing, as the case may be. While 5.56 and 223 Rem does not do well from extremely short barrels, velocities from 16" and 20" barrels are quite fast at times. I think the 224 Valkyrie is going to do very well in the marketplace, and I can't wait to see what ammunition options are available for it when other manufacturers start jumping into the game. How many factory bolt action rifles do you see in the U.S. in .222 vs .223. The reasons might be unclear (I still like 260 Remington, dangit), performance from real world barrel lengths being underwhelming (327 Federal had such promise), or financial (big bore cartridges are awesome, but $2 a round chases people away pretty quick). We've spent more than enough time discussing why I think 224 Valkyrie sounds good on paper. While the 224 Valkyrie's vaunted (too-vaunted, really) "1300 yard" supersonic range is going to be cut short with real world barrel lengths such as 18" compared to a 24" test barrel, keeping a heavy bullet supersonic well past 1000 yards will not be a problem for the Valkyrie. However, the Recon just did not like the 60-grain Ballistic Tip load. I bought the 224V Kool-Aid wish I hadn'tnever could get it to taste right..LOL. in a bolt-action rifle, it is indeed a lighting rod in an AR-15.. However, I would be remiss in discussing the 224 Valkyrie if I did not talk about the 22 Nosler. With the 60-grain load the difference was only 3 fps, with the 75-grain it was 8 fps. Thats like saying one of your AIs are a standard factory gun. If you want to get to know the full history, you only need to go back a few years. We are assessing which products can be legally shipped. Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email. Ive built 3 to date in AR platforms, one 22 6.5t WOA and two 24 1:7.5t Rainier Arms Ultramatch. However, the 22 Nosler has a smaller rim diameter, the same as a .223 Rem. Cartridges are often unfairly compared because shooters tend to look at things from a generalized perspective. Take for example a 300BLK in a bolt, to me that would only make sense if you were going to shoot it subsonic / suppressed all the time. If the Valkyrie's design looks familiar, it should. But i have others that are. If that alone isn't a reason to go with the Valkyrie, I don't know what is. This is a 3.5x35 fixed power scope meant for use on the M240 machine gun and has a ballistic drop compensation reticle to match. Weight Empty: 8 lbs 3.2 oz. And I have shot the 224V to beyond 2000 yards with success. Yes, I know I'm talking about the 50 cents per round 75gr FMJ load here, not target-specific bullets, but even $1.10 a round for match grade stuff is cheaper than most match grade 6.5 Creedmoor. JP is not a custom, factory gun with no upgrades or changes. If you're serious about precision shooting, you probably reload, and the 224 Valkyrie makes even more sense there. I expect any modern rifle to shoot 5 shots inside 1 moa with ammo that it likes. If a cartridge is created with drastically different dimensions, it will not work with currently available magazines. The 224 Valkyrie was designed to shoot heavier bullets up to I can say confidently that there is not a competition I have entered while carrying my 6.5 Creedmoor bolt gun that I could not have done as well or better at with a 224 Valkyrie semi auto, thanks to its reduced weight and recoil, and my skills not being good enough to max out the capability of the Creedmoor. The cartridge is based on the same case as the capable 6.8 SPC, and it was designed for heavy bullets like the ever-popular 90-grain SMK (Sierra MatchKing). 224 VALKYRIE- Effect of barrel length on velocity New cartridges come and go. Speaking of cases, they're shortened, necked down, necked up, or modified as the designers see fit, and very few new cartridge cases are not related in some way to a past case even if that case dates to pre-World War I days - take, for example, the recently introduced 26, 28, and 30 Nosler cartridges, all based on the 404 Jeffery from 1905. That's because the 224 Valkyrie is supersonic at longer range, making your job easier if you want to shoot that far. This novel design from Federal Premium is a fast-stepping .224-caliber cartridge designed for the AR-15, capable of pushing a 75-grain bullet to 3,000 fps. Anyone who has bought a 6.5mm Creedmoor in the last ten years is a prime customer for a 224 Valkyrie rifle. (l.) The hallmark load for the 224 Valkyrie is the 90-grain Sierra MatchKing, which at 2,700 fps has set the new standard for long-range performance from an AR-15. The main reason for the drastic differences in trajectory at 1,000 So yes, it's true that 22 Nosler offers increased performance over 223 Rem, but the difference between a ho-hum 223 Rem load and the velocities one can achieve with 5.56 NATO or Hornady Superformance loads vacate Nosler's vaunted velocity victory. Finally, I don't know what barrel life will be like. One If your eyes tend to glaze over when a lot of numbers come up on your screen, here are the basics: Aside from price, the biggest difference between 22 Nosler and 224 Valkyrie can be seen when we look at the twist rate and loads chosen by their respective manufacturers and backers. I bought a craddock precision upper and it has performed great. Yeah, here we go, 98 will be your back-up. 224 Valkyrie is designed to perform with a twist rate of 1/7 or even faster many barrels are available with a 1 in 6.5" twist. There are simply too many versatile and purpose-built munitions to choose from. Take the .308 Win. However, some excellent (and timely) work by Bill Marr at Rifleshooter.com showed a steady drop in 224 Valkyrie velocity all the way down to 16.5". I enjoyed shooting the 224 but with little chance to stretch the distance out I like the per shot cost of my 223 a lot more , and as I do not yet reload I have no experience on how easy or fickle they could be . Given that we're looking at shooting heavier bullets at lower velocities than the 22 Nosler, which has a stated barrel life of 2000 rounds for target and benchrest use or 4000 rounds for competition, I am strongly inclined to believe that the 224 Valkyrie will have moderately increased barrel life compared to 22 Nosler. The range at which I was shooting only has steel out to 500, but the ACOG BDC was dead on with 224 Valkyrie at every distance available. This is the fundamental difference between 22 Nosler and 224 Valkyrie: Nosler seemed to be chasing either 22-250 or the most impressive muzzle velocity numbers for a press release, while Federal, apparently having learned from experiences such as the 327 Federal debacle, went after downrange performance with heavier bullets. left me feeling underwhelmed for two reasons: first, because I just don't care about extremely high velocities, and second, because it's not that much faster. If you want to shoot an AR-15 at stuff beyond 500 yards, and consistently get hits, the 224 Valkyrie is the best option available. Side note: with a sea level/standard temperature stability factor of 1.34, the 90gr Berger VLD at 2600 out of an 18" 1/7 224V barrel offers slightly greater stability than the shorter 85gr Nosler RDF at 2750 out of an 18" 1/8 22N barrel, which has a stability factor of 1.31. Who DOESNT want a little more powder, and still fit in an AR15 platform ? I've had a box of Berger 90gr VLDs sitting around for almost a decade, and it looks like I'll finally be able to use it. For its .224 Valkyrie test, RifleShooter.com sourced a Shilen Match Barrel and fitted it to a Rem 700 short action employing a one-piece PT&G bolt with the required .440 (SPC-sized) bolt-face. All-new 224 Valkyrie isnt just another cartridge. The Savage Recon LRP averaged 1.75 inches for five, five-shot groups with all four factory loads. Caption: At the finish line of the 2012 24 Hour Sniper Adventure Challenge with my awesome teammate and my Savage 6.5 Creedmoor bolt action rifle. Wow that's a biggin. More case capacity than 6.5 Grendel, 224 Valk, or anything EXCEPT 300 WSSM. But between the .270 Winchester and the .280 Remington, which offers the best performance for the hunter? Federals .22 caliber round generates as little as half as much recoil as the 6.5 Creedmoor. And most are fully capable of this. You must log in or register to reply here. Yes, there are lots of .277-caliber bullets to choose from, but those that will work within the magazine and case restrictions of the 6.8 SPC in the AR-15 platform are few. Both Federal and Nosler appear to be using G1 drag profiles for their trajectory calculations, which give more optimistic numbers than one is likely to encounter in the field. this sucker was full of holes. From what I've seen it's a very touchy cartridge. I tried helping a couple friends with them and from what I recall, RL-15 was the only way to get the 88-90gr bullets to work. I'm not an AR guy per se but its fun as hell. holyshits batman that is a big ass boar ! While I like the sound of 308 on steel, it was just plain easier to make hits with the 224 Valkyrie. Yes with cheaper options you run a larger risk of getting a lemon but more often than not this is not an unattainable goal. LOL My little 98 Husky 4100 Lightweight shoots awesome too, I laid down some amazing groups with that thing this summer, once I put that limb saver butt pad on her, but I never realized how bad the trigger is on that thing! Think again. 12pm-6pm CST Mon So it's true when Nosler says that 22 Nosler has a higher case capacity than 224 Valkyrie, but that minor difference doesn't amount to a whole lot where the rubber meets the road. This hog come out on my shooting lane all the way at the end about 150 yards, i thought it was a bear when i seen it. More important was if the actual velocities equaled those advertised by Federalfor the 224 Valkyrie cartridge. The new 22 Nosler 85gr RDF is by no means bad, but it's no match for the slipperiness of a 90 or 95. Belt FedNovember 26, 2020 in Hunting, Ok the hog from hell story. With the valkyrie and cartridges like @padoms along with all the 6mm s available it's getting tight in performance. The new I was relieved to see that, contrary to my fears, 224 Valkyrie did not depend on long barrels for its performance. It's fair to assume that losing 6" of barrel length causes the most accurate 22 Nosler 85gr RDF load to drop significantly below that 2755fps number. Wing Tactical is your home for the widest selection of quality AR-15 parts, and we have the barrels, bolts and magazines you need to modify your rifle. I think that's where the disappointment lies. LOL, I wish I had that on tape! This was a brief range trip during which I fired only 40 rounds of 224 Valkyrie and 70 rounds of 308 alongside 40 rounds of 223 Rem. He goes down again, i approach a little and fixin to shoot that big head and he jumps up and takes off for the high grass, i put two more rounds in his side. enjoy shooting a different flavor. This is where the 224V starts to make its superiority known over the 22N. But if you keep an eye on the Facebook groups the valkyrie gets so much flak for its accuracy. i'm headed back to camp here in a bit. SHOP NOW. There is, however, a sizable contingent of the gun owning population that can benefit from the advantages of 224 Valkyrie, and even some of the folks who would be "fine" with 5.56 would be better off with 224 Valkyrie. I had a great time smacking steel at some extended ranges for over an hour, and I did this for not a whole lot of money. Federal's 224 Valkyrie has all of these features and more it fits in the more popular AR15 magwell as opposed to the AR10/SR25 length magwell, it is cheaper, and it has even lower recoil. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. WebAt the 1,000 yard marker, the 224 Valkyrie has a bullet drop of -345.8 compared to -475.7 for the 223 Remington. Going to start with some factory hornady 88 grns, then move from there. What does that have to do with the 224 Valkyrie? he fired one round and it didnt even phase him, he shot another and that one done the trick. All four 224 Valkyrie factory loads were tested in each rifle, and surprisingly, there was not a lot of variation in velocities even though there was a 2-inch difference in barrel length. So, they're the same, right? Based on years of testing various ARs, Ive found their average precision to be about 1.5 MOA, when multiple random loads are evaluated. WebThe difference between 224 Valkyrie and 22-250 Remington is their effective range and the bullet weights they fire. Web102K views 5 years ago. It is ballistically superior to anything that is cheaper, and cheaper than anything that is ballistically superior (and even then, we're talking big differences in price for small differences in ballistics). At 500 yards, its still cooking at 1,994 fps and carries 1,422 fps at 1,000 yards. There are several reasons for this. agree with southpaw. The Federal Premium 90-grain .224 Valkyrie has a muzzle velocity of 2,700 fps. Both loads are above the minimum "comfortable stability" factor of 1.5 at altitudes above 3200-3700ft. Receive exclusive deals, new product announcements and need to know information. Plus, of course, there's a supply of 224 Valkyrie ammo from Federal, meaning you can take that brass and reuse it. Currently working on loads with 75gr and waiting on my 88gr to arrive. And, I think, many people shooting 600 yard competitions with 223 Rem/5.56 NATO rifles would be just fine sticking with that they have and what they know. Whether this would apply to other barrels of a different manufacture is unknown. Varmint hunters? Currently I'm waiting for my barrel maker to finish my 6.5 Grendel barrel as I'm going to build one of those as well. I just built one on a Savage 10 action and it's an awesome shooter. ya'll take care. The FGMM 308 was of course more expensive, but let's set that aside for a moment. The 90gr VLD has a G7 of .274, and taking the 18" velocity numbers from Bill Marr's work and running them through the JBM Ballistics calculator, we see that a 90 from an 18" barrel 224 Valkyrie will still be supersonic just past 1050 yards. Photo Credit: Kestrel Meters. In fact, because its so effective at distance, and because the MSR platform has become so popular, were starting to see AR-10s chambered for the 6.5 and even the 6 mm Creedmoor. 224 Valkyrie v 308 Winchester 224 Valkyrie 224 VALKYRIE- Effect of barrel length on velocity February 25, 2018 Bill Marr 0 224 VALKYRIE- Effect of barrel length on Similarly, and particularly with magazine-fed weapons, is the problem of magazine compatibility. 223 rem and 6mm creedmoor just to name a few. WebThe 224 Valkyrie uses standard .224 inches diameter bullets with common loads that range between 60 and 90-grains, and 90 being the most common so far. Paste as plain text instead, Well, at least it's a headshot. If you were, before the 22 Nosler, wishing your 223 Rem rifle was just a little faster, then you are likely very happy with the 22 Nosler concept. (l.) Though the Savage Recon LRP did not shoot as precisely as the tested JP rifle, the 90-grain MatchKing load was still a near-MOA performer in the more- affordable rifle. Even if we acknowledge that most of the Nosler product is match grade stuff with a heavier match bullet and move up to affordable brass cased 223 Rem with a 75gr BTHP, comparable Nosler ammo costs more than twice as much. While you might be able to get your old .223 mag to work, it On the other hand, a 1/7 224 Valkyrie should be just fine with, say, 53gr V-Max, and be very flat within the typical varmint hunting distances. I have a 24 craddock precision upper. But if you wanted more than just a simple addition of a small amount of speed, you are probably going to be very happy with 224 Valkyrie, because, while it does offer more speed than the 223 Rem, it also offers the ability to shoot heavier bullets. Predator hunters and those needing the flattest available cartridge inside 300 yards are in this group. In the 224 Valkyrie, though, you will see a lot of heavy, long, high ballistic coefficient bullets loaded to magazine length, because the designers sacrificed a tiny amount of case capacity to allow for a longer bullet within the length required by the AR lower receiver and magazine internal dimensions. It might be able to fire 55s at over 3250fps! And with the 60-grain Ballistic Tip load, real-world velocities fell about 100 fps short. That doesn't sound cool at all in a press release. And more often than not people dont ask they just buy and ask "did I do good?". You might say the 224 Valkyrie began life as a .30 Rem., because the 112-year-old .30 Rem. Powered by Invision Community. A simple twist of the adjustable gas block corrected both problems. Want some help putting your conversion kit together? One big difference between the Creedmoor and Valkyrie is the increased splash at distance, whether they're misses or hits you simply get more splash from the creed. Unlike the new rifle, though, this one was actually chambered in 308 and based on the "Large Frame AR" platform. Copyright 2023 National Rifle Association. Do you think .308 would have been a quicker put down? SpecializationFor just about any general-purpose endeavor, especially those of a tactical nature, the .223 Rem. I thus built a rifle using an 18" Rock Creek stainless barrel provided by Rainier Arms. For some, that wouldn't be a problem, and they'd never dream of shooting the cheapest brass case factory ammo they could find. Most gun owners, though, can't always afford premium at this level. now we couldnt pick that big sucker up to put on a wheeler and it would probably have bottomed out our springs anyway. If you dont like it dont buy one, pretty fuckin simple solution. The following sections go a bit deeper into the differences between the two cartridges from a ballistic perspective. I've already shot it, and I want to share the gospel of the Valkyrie with you. Accuracy: At 1000 yards, the .224 Valkyrie has low wind-drift and rate of drop, making it an exceptional long-range contender. Yes, there's now an 85 grain 22 Nosler load, but that's just getting started for the 224 Valkyrie, with 90gr factory loads and the new 95gr Sierra MatchKing available soon. about that time a guy in the camp that ask me what i shot rode his wheeler down to my stand to help. Curious what everyone thinks the fate of the .224 Valkyrie will be between it's problematic start with the 90 grain ammo problems and now the 6 ARC being the new AR flavor of the year. The cartridge was specifically designed for the AR platform, therefore it makes no sense to put it in a bolt action. WebCompared to Valkyrie, the 6.5 Grendel has more than doubled the heavy kinetic energy of a 30-30 cartridge, and almost 4x the point of 75-grain other hunting loads at 300 yards, it Muzzle Velocity: 3,300 feet per second (1,451 ft-lbs of muzzle energy) The .224 Valkyrie is a very well designed cartridge that offers marginal advantages over similar cartridges like the .223 Remington and .22 Nosler. The best you can do is a 77. I told him to get his light out and keep his weapon drawn, i turned my weapon light back on and we go in the grass. For the guy shooting beyond 300, theres a distinct advantage in wind deflection. It shoots incredibly flat, but will turn subsonic sooner than the Valkyrie and the wind will push it farther off course. Another thing I don't know: why 6.8 SPC wasn't 224 Valkyrie in the first place. For long-range shooting, the only commercially available AR-15 cartridge that can compare is the 6.5 Grendel. Remember the discussion about where cases come from? How boring! It seems that new rounds are springing up left and right, especially in the AR platform. But, like with the .223 Rem.

Harp Funeral Notices Merthyr Tydfil, Misrule Heather Walter Spoilers, Collin Palmer Ohio State, Articles OTHER