quick dash scoring manual

253.2826 92.0952 l h 266.8817 86.6108 l 339.8228 91.8564 339.2575 91.559 338.6266 91.559 c q 376.3195 104.6118 l 419.9242 348.162 422.5964 354.6365 423.7269 361.522 c -7.6803 -1.3 TD 429.2763 374.8822 430.0984 374.1627 430.3042 373.3406 c S 0 0 0 1 k q 335.2189 83.6972 l /GS3 gs These)]TJ 0 0 0 1 k 0.026 Tw 1 g 276.3065 104.8144 m 270.538 83.2026 m 450.0358 633.2457 462.4711 647.3248 478.1951 659.0407 c 0 Tc (M)Tj h /GS2 gs (r)Tj [(r)20(eduction using field-testing data for)]TJ Initially reviewed by Kim Kurtz, SPT Lindsay Braun, SPT Julie Canfield, SPT Drew Grant, SPT Sean Husted, SPT Becca Todd, SPT Christine Ulses, SPT Mitch Therriault, SPT and Jen Tier, SPT in 5/2014. Q 249.516 96.2597 249.7918 96.2597 v [(that is, mor)20(e than one item\) ar)19(e left)]TJ (DASH)Tj /F12 1 Tf 292.3153 102.0781 292.8114 101.8061 293.3795 101.8061 c 352.9962 101.9946 l h 247.1432 90.2133 245.1391 97.4126 y (2013). 385.8049 98.1231 388.8877 102.2338 387.0382 106.7557 c 264.3937 82.4023 l T* [(which ar)20(e beyond the scope of the 11-)]TJ 249.516 96.2597 249.7918 96.2597 v 0.78462 0 Td f (The final decision of the accepted)Tj 315.3908 96.4165 l 350.589 91.8852 351.1837 92.5161 351.1837 93.2846 c (2011). Q 349.3272 90.312 348.465 90.5004 348.3341 91.1674 c The effects of corticosteroid injection versus local anesthetic injection in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a randomized single-blinded clinical trial. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 133(6): 757-763. 324.7433 101.9003 324.8878 102.3715 324.8878 102.5166 c 36 725.5079 m (wer)Tj 268.9298 104.8383 269.162 104.8945 269.434 104.8945 c 410.8805 198.3234 411.6 196.2681 411.7027 194.3155 c 292.1956 95.0644 l 345.0719 101.9726 l 264.3937 106.1108 l 400.2952 255.6693 402.1453 259.9853 401.7342 264.3018 c ET 383.2354 104.9379 l [(DASH versions\) wer)20(e)]TJ 297.4439 93.5043 297.1242 93.1684 297.1242 92.7124 c 363.2111 91.958 l 0 0 0 1 k 0 Tc (calibrated along the scale length. 245.7079 91.4257 244.7077 94.8754 244.5919 95.2749 c BT BT 318.6671 82.3418 319.2765 81.8701 320.0304 81.8701 c Regarding manual labor, Jester et al. 10 0 0 10 222 429.16 Tm 282.6349 104.0546 l 0 -1.30001 TD -0.51885 -1.30001 TD 430.8179 331.7189 431.4347 330.8969 431.1263 330.5883 c [(V)90(AS of overall pr)19(oblem)-8308(r = 0.70)-15679(r = 0.70)]TJ [(27.5 vs. 52.6)-11683(M)]TJ 0.026 Tw 373.0206 91.6318 l 17.01132 0 TD 401.1174 274.5786 398.5484 269.9541 398.6509 265.2265 c [(enables faster measur)20(ement of disability)]TJ 241.4633 81.7065 l "Accuracy of patient recall of hand and elbow disability on the QuickDASH questionnaire over a two-year period." 0.78461 0 Td T* 475.5228 630.1625 477.6808 630.4709 479.8394 629.854 c 387.1409 244.056 387.963 248.2698 388.2714 252.278 c -1.9211 -1.3 TD /GS3 gs 287.0272 94.3046 l 0.026 Tw -18.72 -3.24999 TD BT /GS2 gs 1173185. 377.6388 94.9233 l /F12 1 Tf Tj q T* /F0 1 Tf 0.78462 0 Td 0 Tw 250.9357 96.1494 248.7897 90.4638 247.7018 87.5844 c [(disability/symptom scor)20(e. By this same)]TJ 266.0497 82.4023 l -0.44386 -1.30001 TD q 242.8373 89.3618 m endstream endobj 16 0 obj << /Length 6059 >> stream 445.0002 438.805 449.4193 432.8442 452.9138 425.6507 c -0.0001 Tc [(an 11-item scale was pr)20(oduced with)]TJ 0 0 0 1 k 0.026 Tw 420.0272 398.4165 421.8769 396.6692 421.4659 395.4359 c "Reliability of a visual analog version of the QuickDASH." 0 -1.3 TD /F2 1 Tf 10 0 0 10 222 449.36 Tm (26.8 vs. 47.1)Tj 295.0756 101.8383 294.5717 101.038 293.2995 101.038 c 351.1837 90.6386 350.5382 90.312 349.9005 90.312 c 263.7855 106.1108 l 0 0 0 1 k BT Q 442.431 515.1632 444.3835 510.3329 448.4946 507.5581 c 398.9594 157.1129 397.2124 161.9433 396.8013 166.5676 c 0 -2.02001 TD (oduced using the item-r)Tj 408.5172 186.7108 409.2362 186.6076 409.853 186.6076 c Q 339.1847 91.8852 339.5977 92.1684 339.8737 92.5234 c Systematic review of the quality of the cross-cultural adaptations of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (Quick DASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. 266.0258 101.9023 l 442.9447 611.0471 446.1307 613.5136 449.4193 615.158 c 275.7623 104.8144 l 285.3551 101.9985 285.4432 101.8061 285.9071 101.8061 c [(The DASH Outcome Measur)20(e has been)]TJ 366.6622 106.5546 l 343.1866 106.5546 l 293.6759 92.1284 l Gabel (2009): Determined from development studies and QuickDASH, supported in study by the practicality focus group. f 386.7736 93.1323 m 354.214 104.9379 l 280.2269 97.1445 l Journal of Hand Therapy 21(4): 354-365. 0 -1.30001 TD f -39.12914 -2.02001 TD 18.6 9.1 TD 378.7765 103.7275 l 244.3024 94.2998 243.3954 91.2431 242.8373 89.3618 c 358.0343 94.5898 l 410.778 95.1424 413.2443 84.8657 409.0309 77.3636 c 0 Tc 351.1618 91.6752 351.1764 91.9868 351.1837 92.2187 c 410.3667 605.8057 414.1692 605.7033 416.7387 607.2448 c 428.0431 608.2723 424.138 608.7865 420.7464 608.3754 c (multiplying by 25. 440.3756 503.7552 439.8615 510.5381 438.0118 517.2185 c 18.72 0.60001 TD 241.9965 90.2075 244.0648 97.4126 y [(Pr)50(operties\))]TJ 407.0781 533.4558 407.5919 543.6299 408.3114 554.2157 c /F1 1 Tf 289.4354 101.038 289.2675 101.2944 289.2675 101.9345 c 268.3859 94.3764 m 380.7052 94.5971 l -1.70166 -1.30001 TD 265.4337 101.9023 l 0.1 scn 0.80348 0 Td 132.788 613.468 235.326 47.164 re Thr)Tj 365.0743 94.0678 l T* 340.983 91.6318 l 364.1202 135.7366 364.8396 128.3373 362.476 122.8907 c BT 266.8817 81.6181 l ET )]TJ 0.80348 0 Td 324.6563 104.4379 324.2067 104.6845 323.6994 104.6845 c 341.6495 103.8359 l 315.0352 106.8808 l ET 411.2917 158.3462 408.8251 166.5676 410.1611 174.0697 c 335.5382 94.9956 335.6613 94.4448 335.6613 93.6835 c Like the DASH, theQuickDASH also has two four-itemoptional modules that are scoredseparately. [(optional high per)10(for)-1(mance spor)10(t/music)]TJ /GS2 gs 0 Tc -0.0002 Tc 293.684 94.3046 l /GS2 gs 322.5099 104.5249 322.8439 105.0107 323.6774 105.0107 c To calculate a QuickDASH score, at least 10 of the 11 items must be completed. f 0.61742 0 Td (The assigned values for all completed)Tj [(DASH to work well in gr)20(oups of)]TJ 360.0352 91.958 l (Quick)Tj 1 g (eated)Tj f f 0.1 scn 253.2826 97.4126 l /GS3 gs 387.2434 518.3487 387.963 526.1591 386.216 530.7841 c q Q BT 235.7337 89.0483 234.2382 89.0483 y 280.299 91.3681 l 333.6314 101.6464 l 385.5343 104.6845 384.8956 104.1552 384.8165 103.4736 c 410.9837 185.066 408.7225 176.7418 413.8611 171.0895 c 287.4755 94.3046 l 391.971 154.7491 391.3542 156.9072 391.7653 159.7847 c )]TJ The median DASH score at baseline and at 2-week follow-up was significantly higher in the radial group vs the transfemoral control group (p < 0.05) (Table 3). 291.9078 92.1284 l (INSTITUTE FOR WORK & HEAL)Tj /GS3 gs 397.8289 113.0244 l S 292.1635 101.038 291.3073 101.8061 291.3073 102.9663 c 393.4096 150.1247 393.2043 157.1129 393.1016 163.0733 c 297.7562 93.7763 l 339.6417 94.3432 339.2286 94.6694 338.6774 94.6694 c [(averaged, pr)20(oducing a scor)19(e out of five. Q 9.15625 0 TD -0.011 Tc 0 Tc 0.026 Tw Quatman-Yates, C. C., R. Gupta, et al. Q 378.7979 90.6386 l 3.25269 0 TD 252.129 96.2597 l /F12 1 Tf 0 0 0 1 k 415.5054 598.3038 418.0746 602.723 421.4659 606.6279 c q (DASH indicated that it could be)Tj 434.5175 456.9954 433.2843 459.4619 433.2843 462.5447 c 299.4042 92.0083 m Q [(DA)-56(S)-29(H)]TJ 280.1469 105.4624 m 279.2826 87.3945 l 263.7775 81.6181 m In this sense, the responsiveness is also a measure of the instruments specificity and is considered to be a form of construct validity. 300.5563 92.1284 l h 343.9992 94.5971 l f [7], Get Top Tips Tuesday and The Latest Physiopedia updates, The content on or accessible through Physiopedia is for informational purposes only. /GS2 gs 333.6314 102.2265 l ET 1.00536 0 Td QuickDASH Scoring e-tool. /GS3 gs Angst, F., H. K. Schwyzer, et al. 273.4261 82.7065 l 411.4973 105.8307 m q 344.9196 91.6318 l ET 290.5956 92.1284 l (2006). 314.4987 96.8662 l 9.99878 0 TD 372.4044 91.958 l 257.483 96.2573 l q /GS3 gs /GS3 gs 344.1076 101.6464 l Q [(of the DASH Outcome Measur)20(e. Instead)]TJ If you believe that this Physiopedia article is the primary source for the information you are refering to, you can use the button below to access a related citation statement. h endstream endobj 15 0 obj << /Length 9769 >> stream 288.3954 95.0644 l s 0.25 scn q 244.3024 94.2998 243.3954 91.2431 242.8373 89.3618 c 277.8746 104.8144 l Gabel, C. P., M. Yelland, et al. 265.3378 95.0644 l 273.4984 95.1445 273.8505 94.9126 273.8505 94.4804 c 312.7804 101.6464 l 379.0744 94.5971 l 287.4755 92.1284 l (Optional Modules)Tj 0 0 0 1 k T* 36 737.181 m Q /GS2 gs f 362.7111 103.1474 l (2009). Link to Instrument Instrument Details Acronym QuickDASH Area of Assessment Activities of Daily Living Communication Coordination Dexterity Eating /GS2 gs [(esponse categor)-5(y)]TJ However, because the full DASH Outcome Measure provides greater precision, it may be the best choice for clinicians who wish to monitor arm pain and function in individual patients. 371.4259 96.54 l 440.0673 506.7359 439.3478 494.9175 434.6202 482.6878 c /GS2 gs 0 -1.30001 TD 364.4874 91.958 l 266.0258 101.1181 l (e. For each module, simply add up)Tj 408.414 92.8816 m 0.026 Tw -8.43677 -1.3 TD The QuickDASH Outcome Measure: Scoring e-tool for use by clinicians QuickDASH Scoring system You may use this e-tool to collect data for a group of patients (Patient 1, 2, 3) or for an individual patient to track their scores over time (Time 1, 2, Quick-DASH Author: Maria L. Ny Created Date: 6/8/2012 12:10:17 PM 314.4191 81.9643 l 336.0236 104.6118 l -0.0001 Tc [(of physical per)10(for)-1(mance. 405.1255 151.5633 407.3861 148.2747 408.5172 144.6776 c 428.7626 375.3959 l 451.8857 370.8741 452.2969 371.902 452.8106 372.3131 c Tj (advantage when choosing which)Tj 286.6751 84.6264 286.3311 84.3867 286.0912 84.1064 c (subtract one and multiply by 25 to)Tj 247.1432 90.2133 247.2877 89.6938 v (internal consistency for individual)Tj 385.0854 160.5042 387.3462 163.1763 387.6546 166.5676 c T* 0.026 Tw 365.0743 94.4882 364.6974 94.6694 364.4005 94.6694 c (patient evaluation \(i.e. 253.2826 97.4126 l 474.7007 484.1264 472.748 482.071 470.7953 479.913 c (ork & Health)Tj (DASH versions)Tj 41.538 0 0 40.187 142.8798 624.9278 Tm 351.546 92.8496 m "Responsiveness of the QuickDASH and SF-12 in workers with neck or upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders: one-year follow-up." 0.51885 0.00001 TD 355.0983 96.8662 l 237.5087 102.0336 238.2643 101.2778 238.2643 100.3461 c 247.7018 106.853 l 367.6554 94.9233 l 0 Tc 241.1015 97.4126 l (able to do all need to versus)Tj 405.5365 110.1469 407.1809 110.558 408.6198 110.4553 c /CS2 cs 1 scn 241.1015 96.2597 l [(per)10(for)-1(ming ar)10(tists and other gr)20(oups of)]TJ (advantages to using the full DASH)Tj 250.9357 96.1494 248.7897 90.4638 247.7018 87.5844 c 277.2184 82.1543 l (items that r)Tj /GS2 gs 343.5636 104.3071 l

Doug Barrowman Net Worth, Oldest Living Person With Hydranencephaly, Flint, Michigan Arrests, Palm Beach Shark Attack, Thomas Plantenga Net Worth, Articles Q